Lesson Four
Physical Examination of the Shoulder - Part Two
Maren Mahowald, M.D.
University of Minnesota
*Note: When interacting with these lessons, click on the red words to view the corresponding VH Dissector images.
Key Elements of the Shoulder Examination
Special Tests for the Shoulder Exam

Special test maneuvers are an important component of the systematic physical examination of the shoulder region. They help confirm or reject diagnostic considerations developed during the medical interview and basic physical examination. These test maneuvers are based on the underlying structural and functional anatomy of the region and are designed to demonstrate the pathologic cause of shoulder pain and dysfunction. The arm is placed in various positions and the patient is instructed to move against resistance applied by the examiner. This will isolate the action of individual muscles and/or put stretch or pressure on the sites of pathology. Unfortunately no 'one test' is sufficiently sensitive or specific to be diagnostic in and of itself.

The combination of history, symptom pattern, and basic physical exam findings, together with one or more abnormal special tests, will indicate the most likely diagnosis to use for selecting treatments. Some tests carry the eponym of the physician who described the test. The clinical utility of the test may not have been independently tested before use became generalized. The evidence, if available, for clinical performance of a special test will be reviewed and sources of false positive and false negative results will be described.

If arm weakness, muscle atrophy or fasciculations are evident during the shoulder examination, systematic sensory and muscle strength testing should be carried out to localize the deficit. Consideration must always be given to the possibility that pathology outside the shoulder region is producing pain referred to the shoulder (to be covered in Part Three).

Painful Arc of Motion Test

The Painful Arc of Motion Test is a simple clinical test to identify which segment of active forward flexion or abduction reproduces the patient's pain.

Painful Arc Test
(Click to view video)
Tests for Rotator Cuff Tendon Problems

Both Rotator Cuff (anterior, posterior) tendonitis and tears produce signs of impingement. Several physical testing maneuvers can focus stress on the individual muscle tendons of the Rotator Cuff and reproduce the patient's pain.

Adhesive Capsulitis ('Frozen Shoulder')

Limited passive and active range of motion in all directions is found with adhesive capsulitis or 'frozen shoulder'.

Rotator Cuff Impingement Signs/Tests

A variety of testing maneuvers have been described to demonstrate Rotator Cuff tendonitis. There are a variety of causes of this condition, including abnormal acromial morphology, osteophytes at the A-C joint, calcium deposit in a Rotator Cuff tendon, and gleno-humeral hyperlaxity with a high riding humeral head. All of these abnormalities can be identified by x-ray, ultrasound, and/or MRI.

Evidence Base for Clinical Utility: These tests do not distinguish between Tendonitis and Rotator Cuff Tears unless weakness is present (see below). Thus far there is no conclusive evidence that any single special test can conclusively diagnose rotator cuff disorders. In a systematic review of ten published studies, the accuracy of clinical examination tests in shoulder disorders indicated an overall sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 54% to detect full thickness rotator cuff tears. In contrast, sensitivty and specificity for MRI was 89% and 93% respectively. Ultrasonography has 87% sensitivity and 96% specificity.

[JDinnes et al. "The Effectiveness of Diagnostic Tests for the Assessment of Shoulder Pain Due to Soft Tissue Disorders: A Systematic Review." Health Technology Assessment 2003; Vol 7 No. 29.]

Tests for Rotator Cuff Tears

Partial and complete Rotator Cuff Tears produce pain during the impingement tests described above with variable degrees of weakness and limitation of active range of motion.

Evidence Base for Clinical Utility: Three simple tests were predictive of Rotator Cuff tears in 400 patients:

In patients of any age who had all three test abnormalities, and in those age 60 or over who had two of three abnormal tests, there was a 98% chance of having a Rotator Cuff tear. Importantly, if none of these clinical tests were abnormal, there was only a 5% chance of having a Rotator Cuff tear. The predictive value of these combined clinical tests is similar to the diagnostic utility of MRI and ultrasonography. Furthermore, the Drop Arm Test had only 10% sensitivity but was 98% specific for Rotator Cuff tears.

[Murerell GAC & Walton JR. "Diagnosis of Rotator Cuff Tears". The Lancet 2001;357: 769-770.]

Tests for Shoulder Instability Problems

Tests for shoulder instability either evoke recurrence of symptoms or demonstrate degree and direction of laxity. However, signs and symptoms of Rotator Cuff problems may also be produced by shoulder instability.

Evidence Base for Clinical Utility: In a study comparing three provocative tests, the Surprise Test was the most accurate diagnostic test for shoulder instability because it had the high Positive Predictive Value and the high Negative Predictive Value.

Apprehension TestRelocation TestSurprise Test
Sensitivity53%46%64%
Specficity99%54%99%
Positive Predictive Value98%44%98%
Negative Predictive Value73%56%78%

[Lo IKY et al "An Evaluation of the Apprehension, Relocation and Surprise Tests for Anterior Shoulder Instability." Am J Sports Med. 2004; 32:301-307. ]

Tests for Labral Tears

Shoulder instability is often accompanied by tears in the Biceps-Glenoid Labrum anchor. However, instability may occur in the absence of labral tears, and labral tears may occur without shoulder instability. A Bankart lesion is an anteroinferior labral tear usually resulting from anterior dislocation or instability. A SLAP lesion is a Superior Labral Tear from Anterior to Posterior, often from a "FOOSH" injury (fall on outstretched arm).

Active Compression of the Biceps-Glenoid Labrum anchor
(Click to view video)

Evidence Base for Clinical Utility:

Active Compression Test: The Active Compression Test had 100% Sensitivity, 99% Specificity, and Positive Predictive Value 95%, Negative Predictive Value 100% for the diagnosis of labral abnormality. Pain at "the top" of the shoulder due to Acromioclavicular disorder was diagnosed by the Active Compression Test with 100% Sensitivity, 97% Specificity, 89% Postitive Predictive Value, and 100% Negative Predictive Value.

[O'Brien et al. "The Active Compression Test: A New and Effective Test for Diagnosing Labral Tears and Acromioclavicular Joint Abnormality." Am J Sports Med 1998;28:610-613.]

Pain Provocation Test: The Pain Provocation Test in this initial descriptive study had 100% Sensitivity and 90% Specificity for SLAP lesions, if the pain on pronation was greater than the pain on supination.

[Mimori et al. "A New Pain Provocation Test for Superior Labral Tears of the Shoulder." Am J sports Medicine 1999;27:137-142.]

Test for instability (the Relocation Test and Anterior Release Test) had a postive Likelihood ratios >5 and negative Likelihood ratios <1. However, the Apprehension Test had a very high Sensitivity, but a low Specificity because it is abnormal in other Rotator Cuff problems. Tests for Labral Lesions that stress the Biceps Tendon and the Pain Provocation Tests (Mimori) had high Positive Likelihood Ratios.

[Luime JJ et al. "Does this Patient Have an Instability of the Shoulder or a Labrum Lesion" (systematic review of the literature) JAMA 2004;292:1989-1999.]

Tests for Biceps Tendon Problems

Tests of the Biceps Tendon involve putting stress or pressure on the Biceps Tendon. These tests can also cause pain with labral lesions.